An article titled "U.S. should respond to call for concluding peace treaty" said that the special representative for North Korea Policy of the U.S. Department of State, talking about order of discussion when referring to the DPRK proposal for concluding a peace treaty, claimed that there should be important progress in the process for denuclearization before replacing the Armistice Agreement (AA) with a peace treaty.

The historical experience proved that no issue can be solved unless the hostile relations between the DPRK and the U.S. are fundamentally settled by replacing the AA with a peace treaty, it noted, adding the U.S. should not misjudge the good faith of the DPRK but ponder over what consequences would be entailed if the former shuns it.

An article slamming the U.S. attempt to re-list the DPRK as "sponsor of terrorism" noted that the U.S. conservative forces' claim is no more than sophism of those obsessed with inveterate repugnancy and hostility toward the DPRK, urging the U.S. to immediately roll back its hostile policy toward it.