First nano scientific and technological presentation to be held

     Pyongyang, February 28 (KCNA) -- The first nano scientific and technological presentation will be held at Kim Chaek University of Technology in the DPRK between March 11 and 12. It will deal with scientific and technological achievements and experience gained in the theory and calculation experiment study in the field of nano science and technology, nano material, nano biology and nano medical science as well as conception, hypothesis and information related to the development of nano science and technology and scientific and technological successes conducive to the development of nano science and technology.
    The presentation to be sponsored by the central committee of the Korean General Federation of Science and Technology will be open to scientists, technicians and teachers of scientific and educational institutions and students of doctoral institutes and those who wish to participate in it.
    It will provide a good occasion of widely disseminating and generalizing scientific and technological successes and experience attained in developing nano science and technology and raising the level of scientists and technicians in the field.

U.S. urged not to misinterpret DPRK's stand

     Pyongyang, February 28 (KCNA) -- The United States is painting the DPRK's self-defensive countermeasure to cope with its escalating military threat and pressure on the DPRK as "brinkmanship tactics" in a bid to build up public opinion. This only betrays the political imbeciles' ignorance of the reality.
    Rodong Sinmun Friday says this in a signed commentary.
    The commentary goes on:
    The DPRK Government withdrew from the NPT to defend the supreme interests and sovereignty of the country under the present situation. This was solely for the purpose of self-defense.
    Its toughest measure is neither threat nor blackmail against anyone.
    However, the U.S. is floating misinformation that the DPRK's just measure is aimed at wresting a sort of "concession" and getting "economic benefits." The U.S. even went to the lengths of making ridiculous remarks that the DPRK will not get any "aid" unless it meets the U.S. demand.
    Base and ridiculous is the U.S. trick to defile the DPRK's just toughest measure with unreasonable and distorted assertion and accusations.
    No matter what misinformation the U.S. floats to slander the DPRK it will not withdraw its principled stance. The further the U.S. escalates its military threat and pressure on the DPRK, the tougher countermeasures it will take to cope with them.
    The U.S. should stop misinterpreting the DPRK's principled stance and tough measure and honestly opt for solving the issue with a sound faculty of thinking.

Gifts to Kim Jong Il

     Pyongyang, February 28 (KCNA) -- Kim Jong Il was presented with gifts by the V. A. Tolokonski, mayor of Novosibirsk region, Russia, Malev, head of the Army Song and Dance Ensemble named after Alexandrov, the Stroimashiintorg Foreign Trade Company and the Venture Company on the occasion of his birthday. The gifts were handed to the DPRK Ambassador to Russia by vice-mayor of Novosibirsk region, the head of the ensemble, leading officials of the companies.
    Handing the gifts, the general director of the Stroimashiintorg Foreign Trade Company said that they wish happiness and good health to Kim Jong Il, great leader of the Korean people, who is firmly defending socialism even under the provocative pressure of the u.s. imperialists, and present a humble gift on his birthday.
    A gift was also sent by the group for the study of works of comrade Kim Jong Il under the Finnish National Committee for the Study of the Juche Idea.

U.S.-planned sabre rattling under fire

     Pyongyang, February 28 (KCNA) -- The U.S. imperialists-projected large-scale joint military exercises are a test nuclear war, a preliminary war against the DPRK, says Minju Joson today in a signed commentary. The commentary goes on:
    They are painting the exercises as an "annual event" and "defensive drills" and they "have nothing to do with the north's nuclear issue". But this is a penny-worth trick to fool the public opinion at home and abroad.
    These joint military exercises are to be staged after the U.S. imperialists have recently deployed scores of B-52, B-1 strategic bombers and several communication commanding and special reconnaissance planes close to the Korean Peninsula and put the 7th U.S. air force present in South Korea into a "semi-war state" under the pretext of coping with an "emergency".
    This is increasing the possibility of their preemptive attack on the DPRK.
    It is none other than the U.S. which is posing a nuclear threat to Korea by threatening to use nukes. It singled out the DPRK as a target of its preemptive nuclear attack in breach of the DPRK-U.S. joint statement.
    The U.S. has systematically breached the statement, refusing to honor its commitments, and shown no positive response to the DPRK's constructive proposals.
    Worse still, it is now going to stage such nuclear war exercises as "Foal Eagle" and "Reception, Staging, Onward Movement and Integration" exercises.
    This proves that the U.S. is only keen to provoke a war of aggression against the DPRK, utterly indifferent to solving the nuclear issue on the Korean Peninsula.
    It is becoming clearer as the days go by that the fuss of the U.S. imperialists about the nuclear issue is nothing but a trick to justify their moves for a nuclear war.
    With nothing can they conceal the criminal nature of the war drills or realize their wild ambition to invade the DPRK.

U.S. urged to drop its daydream

     Pyongyang, February 28 (KCNA) -- The Bush administration is moving heaven and earth to stifle the DPRK under the pretext of its nuclear issue, but this is nothing but a daydream, says Minju Joson today in a signed commentary. It goes on:
    No matter how hard the U.S. works to undermine the socialist system in the DPRK, it remains strong. It is the most advantageous socialist system centered on the popular masses in the world.
    The socialist system is politically, ideologically, economically and militarily stable and indestructible. Under this powerful system, the people's army and people of the DPRK have always countered any moves of aggression forces with strong courage.
    It is by no means fortuitous that the U.S. has sustained only failures and serious setbacks in the moves to stifle the DPRK for the last several decades.
    Yet, the U.S. is still desperately working to strangulate the DPRK. This only betrays its increased zeal for aggression.
    The U.S. is well advised to clearly understand the socialist system and behave with discretion.
    No force on earth can destroy it.

Settlement of nuclear issue through DPRK-U.S. talks called for

     Pyongyang, February 28 (KCNA) -- A final document adopted at the 13th Non-Aligned Summit dealt with the nuclear issue on the Korean Peninsula. A spokesman for the DPRK Foreign Ministry today answered a question put by KCNA in this connection.
    He said:
    The final document of the summit reflected the unanimous view of the participants that the nuclear issue on the Korean Peninsula should be settled through dialogue and negotiations between the parties directly concerned with it.
    This is a strong rebuff to the U.S. which is insisting on "multilateral talks" in a bid to internationalize the nuclear issue, while turning down the DPRK's consistent call for its negotiated settlement between the parties directly concerned with it.
    The DPRK and the U.S. are the parties directly concerned with the nuclear issue on the korean peninsula.
    As the non-aligned movement clarified its stand on this issue, it is the most reasonable way of settling the issue for the DPRK and the U.S. to sit face to face and negotiate it.
    Such stand clarified at the summit of non-aligned nations, which make up the majority of the countries of the world, fairly represents the stand of the international community toward the nuclear issue on the Korean Peninsula.
    The U.S. is well advised to lend an ear to the unanimous voices of the international community demanding a peaceful settlement of the nuclear issue through dialogue and negotiations between the DPRK and the U.S. and immediately opt for a direct dialogue with the DPRK.

Anecdote about Kim Jong Il

     Pyongyang, February 28 (KCNA) -- Kim Jong Il gave on-the-spot guidance to cultural relics in Kaesong on August 22, Juche 57 (1968). Visiting Songgyungwan, he told officials that it was one of the educational institutes with the longest history in the world. He then said it was a pride of the world and national treasure.
    He also told officials that the excellent cultural relics should be kept in their origin and handed down to posterity so that they could know well about the history and culture of the nation and have national pride and patriotic feelings.
    He then visited the tomb of King Kong Min. he, saying the tomb's stone sculptures showed the developed sculptural art in the Koryo period, stressed the need to preserve well historical relics reflecting the nation's wisdom and talents.
    At the Kaesong noodle house, he said noodle was one of the national dishes the Korean people have liked to eat from ancient times. He tasted noodle prepared by the house and said more Korean dishes should be found out and their properties preserved.
    That day he also visited Sonjuk Bridge and other places in the city.

Struggle for peace called for in S. Korea

     Pyongyang, February 28 (KCNA) -- The Solidarity for Implementing the South-North Joint Declaration in a special resolution issued on Feb. 22 reportedly called on the 70 million Koreans to turn out in a struggle for peace against war, adding that it will exert efforts to achieve the great national unity. Saying that anti-U.S. action is the only way for the Korean nation to survive, the resolution appealed to all the Koreans to come out in the struggle to protect their right to existence, security and peace of the nation.
    Reiterating that the conclusion of a non-aggression treaty between the north and the U.S. is the only way of seeking the peaceful settlement of the nuclear issue on the Korean Peninsula, it declared that the organization would launch a campaign for the conclusion of the treaty.
    We will stage a more vigorous struggle to force the U.S. troops, the root cause of war on the Korean Peninsula, out of South Korea to the last man and build a lasting peace mechanism, the resolution added.

Kim Yong Nam meets member of European parliament from BLP

     Pyongyang, February 28 (KCNA) -- Kim Yong Nam, President of the Presidium of the DPRK Supreme People's Assembly, met and had a talk with Glyn Ford, member of the European parliament from the British Labor Party, and his party at the Mansudae Assembly Hall today.

U.S. indicted for spawning nuclear issue on Korean Peninsula

     Pyongyang, February 28 (KCNA) -- The Lawyers' Committee of the DPRK today indicted the U.S. for its criminal act of spawning the nuclear issue on the Korean Peninsula. The indictment says:
    The Bush administration's non-compliance with the commitments made between the DPRK and the U.S. for the solution to the nuclear issue on the Korean Peninsula is a breach of the principle of international law which calls on the signatories to a treaty to honor their commitments.
    The Bush administration has not fulfilled anything it committed itself to honor in return for the DPRK's measures of declaring its moratorium on its withdrawal from the Nuclear non-Proliferation Treaty and keeping its graphite-moderated reactor and its related nuclear facilities frozen in line with the June 11, 1993 DPRK-U.S. joint statement and the October 21, 1994 DPRK-U.S. Agreed Framework.
    Firstly, the U.S. backpedaled its commitment to provide LWR power plants with a total generating capacity of 2,000 mw by 2003 to replace the DPRK's graphite-moderated reactor and its related facilities and fled from its responsibility to make up for the loss of electricity caused by the delayed provision of the power plants.
    Secondly, the U.S. is committed to annually supply 500,000 tons of heavy oil to the DPRK to make up for the loss of electricity caused by the frozen graphite-moderated reactor and its related facilities but the U.S. made an irregular delivery of it very often, thus throwing the economic development in the DPRK in confusion. The U.S. even went the lengths of completely stopping its supply from December 2002.
    Thirdly, the U.S. asserted that earlier inspection should be made at the phase where only site preparation is under way for the light water reactor power plants in contravention of its commitment made under paragraph 7 of the confidential minutes subject to AF which calls for inspection for verifying the accuracy and integrity of the initial report on the nuclear substance only after a considerable portion of the light water projects is completed, ie after turbines, generators and other non-nuclear parts have been delivered.
    Fourthly, it has kept applying its political and economic sanctions against the DPRK while refusing to comply with its commitments to ease trade and investment barriers including the lift of restrictions on telecommunications service and financial transactions three months after the adoption of the AF with a view to fully normalizing the political and economic relations between the two countries.
    Fifthly, the U.S. drove the situation on the Korean Peninsula to the brink of war by openly posing a threat of military attack to the DPRK after singling it out as a "target of nuclear attack" in violation of its commitment to give the DPRK formal assurances against its use or threat of nukes so as to turn the Korean Peninsula into a nuclear free zone and ensure peace and security there.
    Sixthly, the U.S. put the already started DPRK-U.S. talks in a total stalemate and threatened to bring the DPRK down, groundlessly terming it "part of an axis of evil" and a "rogue state," in violation of its commitments to respect the sovereignty of the other side, not to interfere in its internal affairs but have a dialogue with it on a fair and equal footing.
    Seventhly, the U.S. stood in the way of the project of reconnecting the railways in the western coastal area and other inter-Korean economic cooperation in violation of its commitment to support the peaceful reunification of Korea, asserting that there should be no improved inter-Korean relations unless those materials about the nuclear issue gathered by it are verified.
    The Bush administration's non-compliance with the agreements which the DPRK concluded with its preceding administration is a grave illegal act and base perfidy as it wantonly violated the principles of international law which calls for equality between the signatories to a treaty and their sincere implementation of the international commitments. The Bush administration's refusal to honor any of the bilateral agreements not only constitutes an act of breaking international faith and betraying the other signatory but a breach of the "declaration of principles of international law to be observed by states on the basis of the UN Charter" and the Vienna Convention on the treaty law, which call for sincerely implementing commitments under an international treaty.
    However, the Bush administration has worked hard to conceal its unlawful act of breaking international faith while creating the impression that Pyongyang has violated the DPRK-U.S. agreements on the basis of the recently obtained information in a bid to flee from the responsibility for spawning the nuclear crisis on the Korean Peninsula.
    Groundlessly accusing the DPRK of pushing forward the nuclear program after the Pyongyang visit of the special envoy of the U.S. President early in October 2002, the U.S. administration stood in the way of the DPRK-Japan talks and the inter-Korean cooperation, arguing that there will be no DPRK-U.S. talks and the DPRK-Japan and the north-south relations will be adversely affected unless Pyongyang scraps the program.
    The U.S. threat of preemptive nuclear attack on the DPRK virtually annulled the joint declaration on the denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula issued by the north and the south of Korea in January 1992, making it meaningless for the DPRK to remain under the NPT.
    The DPRK's withdrawal from the NPT was a self-defensive measure taken under the situation where the preconditions for its accession to the NPT--the U.S. should neither deploy nuclear weapons on the Korean Peninsula nor pose a nuclear threat to the DPRK--were not met.
    Article 10 a of the NPT stipulates that "each party shall in exercising its national sovereignty have the right to withdraw from treaty if it decides that extraordinary events related to the subject matter of this treaty have jeopardized the supreme interests of its country. It shall give notice of such withdrawal to all other parties to the treaty and to the un security council three months in advance."
    Therefore, it is an exercise of its right as a party to the treaty to cope with the grave situation where its supreme interests have been exposed to serious jeopardy.
    The DPRK's withdrawal from the treaty was in full accord with the norms of the Vienna convention on the treaty law as Washington has not implemented its commitments under the AF but finally scrapped it.
    The DPRK's withdrawal from the NPT was a final decision which took an immediate effect.
    The DPRK Government declared the immediate effectuation of its withdrawal from the treaty in its January 10, 2003, statement because it lifted the moratorium on the effectuation of the withdrawal in the DPRK-U.S. Joint Statement on June 11, 1993, one day before its deadline, ie three months after the declaration of its withdrawal from the treaty on March 12 of the same year.
    According to the general principle of international law on the suspension of prescription, the period of prescription does not become invalid in case it was suspended and it takes effect after the lapse of the remaining period of prescription since the lift of suspension.
    Therefore, the day after the DPRK lifted the temporary suspension of the effectuation of its withdrawal from the NPT becomes the last day of the three months stipulated in the article for the withdrawal and also becomes the day the DPRK's withdrawal from the NPT takes its final effect.
    As the DPRK's withdrawal from the NPT took effect, there remains no longer any legally binding relations between the DPRK and the international atomic energy agency as it nullified all the rights and duties under the treaty including the safeguards agreement that had existed between the two sides.
    The Bush administration, however, put in motion the IAEA, which has no legal mandate to discuss the DPRK's "nuclear issue," to internationalize the issue and create an atmosphere of international pressure upon the DPRK.
    The U.S. should unconditionally accept the DPRK proposal for concluding a non-aggression treaty for the settlement of the nuclear crisis on the Korean Peninsula.
    Peace and stability have not settled on the Korean Peninsula but the situation there is getting tenser with each passing day. The U.S. is entirely to blame for this.
    The nuclear issue on the Korean Peninsula should be settled by way of holding the DPRK-U.S. dialogue on an equal footing and by concluding a non-aggression treaty between them in view of the circumstances of its emergence, the true nature of the crisis and the responsibility for it.
    The DPRK-U.S. non-aggression treaty should be an international treaty with strong assurances as it should be ratified by the DPRK's Supreme People's Assembly and both houses of U.S. Congress, the highest law-making institutions in both countries.
    The DPRK's proposal for concluding the treaty is aimed to provide a legal binding force to control and prevent the U.S. from using nukes and posing a threat of military attack to it.
    It is not a leverage to get a sort of reward nor is it a temporary expedient so-called "brinkmanship tactics."
    The U.S. should immediately respond to the DPRK's proposal for concluding a non-aggression treaty, instead of trying to flee from its responsibility for spawning the nuclear crisis on the Korean Peninsula from an international legal point of view.
    It is the hope of the Lawyers' Committee of the DPRK that the governments, judicial organizations and lawyers of the world would extend support and solidarity to the DPRK Government's principled stand to find a fair settlement of the nuclear issue on the Korean Peninsula.

For Spanish-speaking people

ee.uu. no podra liberarse jamas de responsabilidad de derecho internacional

     pyongyang, 28 de febrero (atcc) -- el comite de juristas de la republica popular democratica de corea hizo publica el dia 28 el acta de acusacion a los actos criminales de estados unidos, promotor del problema nuclear de la peninsula coreana. el acta de acusacion senala en particular:
    el acto de la administracion bush que anulo los compromisos entre la republica popular democratica de corea y los estados unidos encaminados a solucionar el problema nuclear de la peninsula coreana constituye una violacion al principio del derecho internacional segun el cual los paises signatarios deben cumplir fielmente sus deberes asumidos ante el tratado.
    la administracion bush incumplio todos sus deberes que debe ejecutar en vez de suspender provisionalmente la validez de la retirada de la rpdc del tratado de no proliferacion nuclear (tnpn) y congelar el reactor moderado de grafito y las instalaciones nucleares conexas segun la declaracion conjunta rpdc-ee.uu. del 11 de junio de 1993 y el acuerdo basico rpdc-ee.uu. del 21 de octubre de 1994.
    primero, incumplio su deber de "ofrecer los reactores de agua ligera con capacidad generadora de 2 millones de kilovatios en total hasta 2003" para sustituir el reactor moderado de grafito de la rpdc y sus instalaciones conexas y eludio su responsabilidad de indemnizar la perdida de energia electrica ocasionada por su postergacion.
    segundo, pese a su deber de ofrecer cada ano 500 mil toneladas de aceite pesado para recompensar la perdida de energia por la congelacion del reactor moderado de grafito de la rpdc y sus instalaciones conexas ee.uu. con frecuencia no lo suministro normalmente creando caos en el desarrollo economico de la rpdc y a parir de diciembre de 2002 lo interrumpio completamente.
    tercero, falto al compromiso de realizar la inspeccion relativa a la verificacion sobre la exactitud y la perfeccion del informe basico sobre las materias nucleares despues de la entrega de la porcion considerable de reactores de agua ligera, a saber la turbina, el generador y otras partes no nucleares segun el articulo 7 de la nota de entendimiento extra oficial del acuerdo basico rpdc-ee.uu. e insistio en ejecutar la inspeccion temprana en la etapa de la obra de cimentacion de los reactores de agua ligera".
    cuatro, continuo su sancion politico-economica contra la rpdc al incumplir su deber de "aliviar, dentro de tres meses posteriores a la firma del acuerdo, la barrera del comercio e inversion incluyendo el levantamiento de las medidas de restriccion sobre el servicio de comunicaciones y la liquidacion financiera" para "normalizar completamente las relaciones politicas y economicas" entre ambos paises.
    quinto, falto al compromiso de ofrecer a la rpdc la garantia oficial de no hacer uso de las armas nucleares ni amenazar con estas para desnuclearizar la peninsula coreana y preservar la paz y la seguridad, definio a la rpdc como blanco de ataque nuclear y ejercicio una abierta amenaza de ataque militar contra ella llevando la situacion de la peninsula al borde de la guerra.
    sexto, falto al compromiso de "respetar mutuamente la soberania de la contraparte, dejar de intervenir en sus asuntos internos y dialogar sobre la base igualitaria y equitativa", interrumpio totalmente el dialogo iniciado con la rpdc y definio a esta como "eje del mal" y "pais bribon" amenazando con "derrumbarla".
    septimo, al faltar a su compromiso de "apoyar la reunificacion pacifica de corea" dijo que seria imposible llevar adelante las relaciones norte-sur antes de que fueran aclarados sus materiales infundados relativos al problema nuclear y puso freno a la union de la ferrovia de la costa occidental y otras actividades de cooperacion economica entre el norte y el sur.
    la negacion total de la administracion bush al acuerdo con la rpdc deviene una traicion a la confianza internacional y a su contraparte signataria y una violacion a la "declaracion sobre el principio del derecho internacional de los estados a base de la carta de la onu" de ejecutar sinceramente los deberes asumidos ante el tratado internacional y al convenio de viena sobre la ley del tratado.
    pero, la administracion bush induce en error la opinion publica diciendo que niega el acuerdo con la rpdc segun los "datos de informatica" recogidos recientemente para eludir su responsabilidad de la crisis nuclear en la peninsula coreana y maniobra para ocultar su flagrante acto de traicion a la confianza internacional.
    con motivo de la visita a pyongyang del enviado especial del presidente norteamericano en octubre de 2002 la administracion bush acuso sin fundamento alguno a la rpdc de promover el plan nuclear y puso freno a las conversaciones rpdc-japon y la cooperacion norte-sur de corea al decir que de no renunciarlo la rpdc, no habra el dialogo rpdc-ee.uu. sino se ejercera grave influencia sobre las relaciones entre la rpdc y japon y entre el norte y el sur de corea.
    la amenaza de ataque nuclear anticipado de ee.uu. a la rpdc hizo anular la declaracion conjunta de desnuclearizacion de la peninsula coreana publicada por el norte y el sur de corea en enero de 1992 e hizo insignificante que el gobierno de la rpdc siga quedando en el tnpn.
    la retirada de la rpdc del tnpn constituye una medida autodefensiva frente al desacato de ee.uu. al requisito del ingreso en el tratado de no emplazar las armas nucleares en la peninsula coreana ni amenazar con estas a la rpdc.
    la clausura 1 del articulo 10 del tnpn estipula que "todos los paises signatarios tienen el derecho a retirarse de este tratado ejerciendo su soberania en el caso de que se considere que sean amenazados sus intereses supremos. el pais signatario interesado debe avisar tres meses antes su retirada a todos los demas paises signatarios y al consejo de seguridad de la onu".
    puesto que ee.uu. anulo el acuerdo al cabo de incumplir sus deberes asumidos ante el acuerdo basico con la rpdc, la retirada de esta del tratado conviene enteramente al reglamento del convenio de viena sobre la ley del tratado.
    el gobierno de la rpdc en la declaracion fechada 10 de enero de 2003, senalo que se produciria inmediata y automaticamente la validez de la retirada del tratado porque a traves de ella levanto la suspension provisional de la validez de la retirada tomada por la declaracion conjunta rpdc-ee.uu., el 11 de junio, es decir un dia antes para completar tres meses que son periodo necesario para producir la validez de la retirada proclamada el 12 de marzo de 1993 por la rpdc. segun el principio general del derecho internacional, en la suspension de la prescripcion no se considera nulo el periodo de validez ya transcurrido y se produce efecto cuando expire el resto del periodo de validez luego de levantada la suspension.
    por tanto, el dia siguiente del levantamiento de la suspension provisional de la validez de la retirada de la rpdc del tnpn es la fecha en que se completan los tres meses definidos en el articulo de la retirada del tratado y que se produce definitivamente la validez de la retirada de la rpdc del tratado.
    al entrar en vigor la retirada de la rpdc del tnpn, entre esta y la oiea no existen las relaciones juridicas algunas y fueron perdidos ya todos los derechos y deberes asumidos ante el tratado por ambas partes incluido el convenio de salvaguardia.
    pero, la administracion bush internacionaliza el problema nuclear de la peninsula coreana y crea un ambiente de presion internacional movilizando para este fin la organizacion internacional de energia atomica que no tiene la facultad juridica alguna de hablar del "problema nuclear" de la rpdc.
    ee.uu. debe aceptar incondicionalmente la propuesta de concertar el tratado de no agresion que presento la rpdc para resolver la crisis nuclear de esta peninsula.
    recae enteramente sobre ee.uu. la responsabilidad de que hoy en esta peninsula no se preservan la paz y la estabilidad exacerbandose de continuo la situacion.
    el problema nuclear a juzgar por el proceso de su nacimiento, la esencia de su estado y la responsabilidad, debe resolverse estrictamente a traves del dialogo igualitario y la concertacion del tratado de no agresion, entre la rpdc y ee.uu..
    el tratado debe constituir un compromiso internacional de gran peso y fianza que requiere la ratificacion de los organos legislativos supremos, es decir de la asamblea popular suprema por parte de la rpdc y de ambas camaras del congreso por parte de ee.uu..
    la propuesta de la rpdc de concertar el tratado de no agresion con ee.uu. tiene por objeto preparar la fuerza de restriccion legal para controlar y eliminar el uso de las armas nucleares y la amenaza de ataque militar de ee.uu., en fin no es para recibir indemnizacion alguna ni constituir una improvisada "tactica al borde de barranco".
    ee.uu. no debe eludir su responsabilidad de derecho internacional como promotor de la crisis nuclear en la peninsula coreana, sino acceder de inmediato a la propuesta de la rpdc de concertar el tratado de no agresion.
    el comite de juristas de la rpdc esta convencido de que los gobiernos, los juristas y sus entidades de todos los paises del mundo enviaran apoyo y solidaridad a la posicion de principios del gobierno de la rpdc de resolver justamente el problema nuclear de la peninsula coreana.

tendra lugar primer forum de nano

     pyongyang, 28 de febrero (atcc) -- tendra lugar los dias 11 y 12 de marzo el primer forum cientifico-tecnico de nano en el instituto universitario politecnico kim chaek. en la ocasion se presentaran los exitos cientificos y tecnicos y experiencias logrados en la investigacion de la teoria y de calculo - ensayo del dominio de la ciencia y tecnica de nano, la sugestion, la hipotesis y los materiales sobre la corriente de su desarrollo y otros logros que contribuiran al desarrollo de la ciencia y la tecnica de nano.
    en el forum auspiciado por el cc del la federacion general de ciencias y tecnicas de corea pueden presentar sus ponencias los cientificos, tecnicos, profesores y miembros de los cursos postgraduados de los organos de la investigacion cientifica y educacion y todas las demas personas que deseen.
    el forum servira de buena oportunidad para divulgar y generalizar ampliamente los exitos y experiencias cientificos y tecnicos logrados en el desarrollo de la ciencia y tecnica de nano, y elevar a una etapa mas alta el nivel de los cientificos y tecnicos del ramo.